Engineering principles

Standards should be visible in the work.

These principles turn broad values into practices a client can inspect in architecture, source control, tests, documentation, delivery, and handoff.

In practice

Six commitments that guide technical choices.

Understand before automating

Clarify the decision, user, constraint, and failure cost before choosing tools or adding machinery.

Visible evidence

  • Problem statements and acceptance criteria
  • Documented assumptions and constraints
  • Options considered before implementation

Trace source to outcome

Make it possible to follow important data and decisions through transformations, models, metrics, and outputs.

Visible evidence

  • Lineage and metric definitions
  • Data-quality rules near transformation logic
  • Limitations recorded with analytical results

Prefer small, reversible steps

Reduce delivery risk by making changes easier to review, verify, release, and reverse.

Visible evidence

  • Focused pull requests
  • Incremental migrations and releases
  • Rollback and recovery guidance

Build verification into delivery

Use automation to catch predictable failures before they become review burden or operational incidents.

Visible evidence

  • Tests and static checks
  • Repeatable build and deployment workflows
  • Explicit readiness and post-deployment checks

Design for client ownership

A system is not successfully transferred if its next safe change still depends on undocumented context.

Visible evidence

  • Operating instructions and decision records
  • Knowledge-transfer sessions
  • Clear ownership and support boundaries

Protect people and information

Collect less, limit access, design accessible interfaces, and describe security and privacy boundaries honestly.

Visible evidence

  • Least-privilege service permissions
  • Accessible navigation and form behavior
  • Retention and processing practices documented publicly

Tradeoffs

No principle removes judgment.

Security, cost, speed, operability, and future flexibility can pull in different directions. Dagitali records consequential tradeoffs so later decisions begin with context rather than archaeology.

Questions worth recording

  • What problem does this choice solve?
  • What alternatives were considered?
  • What new limitation does it introduce?
  • What evidence would justify revisiting it?

What this avoids

  • Architecture justified only by fashion
  • Complexity without an identified consumer
  • Silent changes to security or operating assumptions
  • Documentation that describes behavior the system no longer has

See the evidence

Review how these principles appear in public Dagitali repositories.

Explore technical work